Today, as the life of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s is re-examined on the 50th anniversary of his death by sniper fire,
it is tempting to buy into the lukewarm Santa Claus version of who Dr. King
was, promoted by big-money politicians and corporate TV.
Dr. King was a radical…in every sense of the word, and
was often unpopular during his lifetime.
From Dr. Cornel West, quotes from an article out today at
the Guardian, entitled “Martin Luther King Jr was a radical. We must not sterilize his legacy”:
His grand fight against poverty, militarism, materialism and racism
undercuts the superficial lip service and pretentious posturing of so-called
progressives as well as the candid contempt and proud prejudices of genuine
reactionaries. King was neither perfect nor pure in his prophetic witness – but
he was the real thing in sharp contrast to the market-driven semblances and
simulacra of our day.
In this brief celebratory moment of King’s life and death we should be
highly suspicious of those who sing his praises yet refuse to pay the cost of
embodying King’s strong indictment of the US empire, capitalism and racism in
their own lives.
One of the last and true friends of King, the great Rabbi Abraham
Joshua Heschel prophetically said: “The whole future of America will depend
upon the impact and influence of Dr King.” When King was murdered something
died in many of us. The bullets sucked some of the free and democratic spirit
out of the US experiment. The next day over 100 American cities and towns were
in flames – the fire this time had arrived again!
Today, 50 years later the US imperial meltdown deepens. And King’s
radical legacy remains primarily among the awakening youth and militant
citizens who choose to be extremists of love, justice, courage and freedom,
even if our chances to win are that of a snowball in hell! This kind of
unstoppable King-like extremism is a threat to every status quo!
Love is a radical thing, and so is justice – both of
which can be difficult to maintain in troubling time of scarcity and suffering. But glossing over is not the cure for the
horrors of human suffering, described by Dr. King as racism, materialism and
militarism.
From an essay by John Whitehead of the RutherfordInstitute on Dr. King’s radical and often unpopular vision:
Despite having been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, graced countless
magazine covers, and consorted with movers and shakers throughout the country,
King was not a popular man by the time of his death. In fact, a Gallup poll
found that almost two-thirds of Americans disapproved of King.
Fifty years later, the image of the hard-talking, charismatic leader,
voice of authority, and militant, nonviolent activist minister/peace warrior
who staged sit-ins, boycotts and marches and lived through police attack dogs,
water cannons and jail cells has been so watered down that younger generations
recognize his face but know very little about his message.
There’s a reason for that.
This revisionist history—a silent censorship of sorts—has proven to be
a far more effective means of neutralizing radicals such as Martin Luther King
Jr. than anything the NSA, CIA or FBI could dream up.
This was a man who went to jail over racial segregation laws,
encouraged young children to face down police dogs and water hoses, and who
urged people to turn their anger loose on the government through civil
disobedience. King called for Americans
to rise up against a government that was not only treating blacks unfairly but
was also killing innocent civilians, impoverishing millions, and prioritizing
the profits of war over human rights and dignity.
King actually insisted that people have a moral responsibility to
disobey unjust laws.
And speaking to the healing power of love, Robert F.
Kennedy, whose brother, President John F. Kennedy had already been assassinated,
and who would himself be assassinated not long after Dr. King, spoke thesewords on the eve of Dr. King’s death, challenging the world to embrace healing and
empowering radical change:
Martin Luther King dedicated his life to love and to justice for his
fellow human beings, and he died because of that effort.
In this difficult day, in this difficult time for the United States, it
is perhaps well to ask what kind of a nation we are and what direction we want
to move in. For those of you who are black--considering the evidence there
evidently is that there were white people who were responsible--you can be filled
with bitterness, with hatred, and a desire for revenge. We can move in that
direction as a country, in great polarization--black people amongst black,
white people amongst white, filled with hatred toward one another.
For those of you who are black and are tempted to be filled with hatred
and distrust at the injustice of such an act, against all white people, I can
only say that I feel in my own heart the same kind of feeling. I had a member
of my family killed, but he was killed by a white man. But we have to make an
effort in the United States, we have to make an effort to understand, to go
beyond these rather difficult times.
What we need in the United States is not division; what we need in the
United States is not hatred; what we need in the United States is not violence
or lawlessness; but love and wisdom, and compassion toward one another, and a
feeling of justice toward those who still suffer within our country, whether
they be white or they be black.
